| The Age of Aquarius is supposed to start soon. | | | | slippage that has taken place since the Sun's |
| Indeed some people say that it has already | | | | equinoctial position first moved into Pisces. In |
| started. They point to humanity's elevated | | | | astrological jargon, this measure is called 'the |
| consciousness, as well as to a general | | | | ayanamsa'. |
| dissatisfaction with traditional approaches to | | | | One ayanamsa that's popular amongst Western |
| spirituality. However if you look at the facts, it's | | | | astrologers is the Fagan-Bradley ayanamsa. On |
| quite clear that the Age of Aquarius doesn't start | | | | January 1 2010 the Fagan-Bradley ayanamsa |
| for centuries. | | | | gives the slippage as 24 degrees and 53 minutes. |
| Unfortunately, the key facts relate to astronomy | | | | When we convert this to time, we discover that |
| rather than astrology, but I'll nonetheless try to | | | | the Age of Pisces started at the beginning of the |
| keep things simple. | | | | Third Century AD - I make it around AD 228. |
| There is a phenomenon known as 'the precession | | | | This means that the Age of Aquarius doesn't |
| of the equinoxes'. At the exact time of the Spring | | | | start until AD 2376, which isn't for another 366 |
| Equinox, which is in late March in the Northern | | | | years. |
| Hemisphere, you can map the position of the Sun, | | | | So the start of the Age of Pisces coincided with |
| from the Earth's point of view, onto the | | | | the rapid growth of Christianity, and it heralded |
| background of the stars. | | | | that key historical event, the conversion of the |
| Every year, against this background, the Sun's | | | | Roman Emperor Constantine to Christianity, at |
| position will show some slippage, that amounts to | | | | the beginning of the Fourth Century AD. |
| one degree every seventy-two years. The | | | | As we look at the Age of Pisces unfolding, |
| slippage adds up, and after 25,771 years, it will | | | | Christianity goes from strength to strength, |
| have slipped back a full circle, of 360 degrees. | | | | though its advance is eventually checked by the |
| The Sun's Spring Equinox position is broadly | | | | rise of Islam. And of course both Christianity and |
| speaking related to the constellations, and it will | | | | Islam put a high premium on martyrdom. That's a |
| take 2148 years to go through each of the | | | | very Piscean concept, sacrificing one's life for the |
| twelve signs of the Zodiac. Yet this is something | | | | sake of a high purpose. |
| of an approximation, because the constellations | | | | Yet some people would say that Christianity is |
| are of unequal length. | | | | running out of steam, at least in North America |
| This means, if one is a purist, that the | | | | and Western Europe. Isn't this a sign that the Age |
| Pisces-Aquarius changeover won't happen until | | | | of Pisces is coming to an end, that the Age of |
| close on AD 3000. This is because the | | | | Aquarius is just round the corner? |
| constellation of Pisces is huge, and right now, at | | | | However if you look at some of the 'new age' |
| the time of the Spring Equinox, the Sun is in the | | | | replacements for Christianity, they embody many |
| middle of this constellation. It won't start leaving | | | | of the features of the sign Pisces. Fuzzy and |
| Pisces, and moving into Aquarius, for another | | | | chaotic thinking, and the embracing of new and |
| eight hundred years. In other words, the Age of | | | | old fads without asking too many questions. |
| Aquarius won't start until at least AD 2800. | | | | Crystal healing, channelling, dancing with nature, it's |
| However I think the purist approach is too | | | | all part of the Age of Pisces experience. |
| extreme. The astrological ages should be of equal | | | | It should also be said that the new age |
| length, even if this means having a certain | | | | movement has got very little to do with the sign |
| disconnect with the real constellations. We can | | | | Aquarius. After all, Aquarius is a tough sign, that's |
| therefore say that every 2148 years we'll move | | | | ruled by Saturn. It's also a sign that's rational, that |
| from one age to another. | | | | puts the head before the heart. And in many |
| Our next task is to work out what date the Age | | | | cases, the sign Aquarius has a tyrannical streak. |
| of Pisces, which we're still in, actually started. | | | | But not to worry. By the time the Age of |
| To do this, we need a precise measure of the | | | | Aquarius starts, all of us will be long dead. |