Gambling in Casinos is Legal so Why is it Illegal on the Internet?

Recently the United States government hasIf we look at the issue from an even broader
passed a law making it illegal for credit cardperceptive is not gambling on the internet less
companies or other such institutions in the Unitedharmful on the whole then investing or gambling
States to make payments over the internet toon the stock market? Depending on how one
businesses that are involved in online gambling. Iwishes to label it, always bearing in mind that
for my part would like to say that I am not agambling is an activity in which money changes
gambler of any kind as the times that I havehands more by chance then by skill or knowledge.
been to a casino or gambled at one are so fewThe stock market naturally being more harmful
as to be counted on one hand so it is not with aby virtue of being able to cause devastating
personal interest that I am against such a law noreffects on the economy of the whole world
is it that I profit in any way, shape or form fromwhereas internet gambling may realistically involve
online gambling or any other kind. I merely speakonly those who directly partake in it. Furthermore
out against a law that I consider to be unfair,losses from internet gambling could never even
illogical and hypocritical as it allows the sameapproach those that were caused by the "sub
activity when practiced in Casinos in cities like Lasprime market" which has set the world in to
Vegas or Atlantic City but not on the internet. Torecession; though few are willing to use the term,
my way of thinking this is the equivalent ofat least for now.
passing a law that makes it illegal to consumeÂ
liquor in bars but not in restaurants; where theThe reason the United States congress has seen
activity is left unaltered but for some reason thefit to declare gambling on the internet as illegal is
law strikes out against.based upon "morality". I personally do not see
Âhow this be "immoral"; if such a word could be
The issue to those who made the law regardingapplied to people who by there own free will are
online gambling in the United States was so calledrisking their own assets as opposed to those who
"morality" which of course is arbitrary and if onedo likewise on the stock market. The stock
looks at things from a purely logical point of viewmarket being a place where on many occasions
should never be used as a basis for law. It beingthose who invest do not even do so with their
this sort of thinking which in the US lead to theown savings but those of others who are not
failed Volstead Act. This act being the one thatnecessarily among society's most affluent or
brought about prohibition in the United Statessometimes not even informed as to what is being
during the 20s which contrary to populardone with their money. Is it not or should it not
misconception made it unlawful not to produce orbe up to each individual to decide in what form he
consume alcohol but to sell or buy it. Meaning oneor she wishes to spend or risk loosing his or her
could not profit from it which of course some didfinancial resources or in this case not even on
and in a huge way.what but where?Â
ÂÂ
Morality regardless of what ever we may be toldHowever I in what be this whole affair see
is a point of view which has always been; as whatsomething else that perhaps some do not and
is considered to be moral by one individual orthat is if people are not allowed to gamble on the
society will not necessarily be considered as suchinternet or at least those in the US then would
by another individual or society. For instance somethey not be forced to do so exclusively in
may consider adultery as immoral though the lawAmerican casinos as they would be left with no
in most countries does not regard it as illegal or atother legal choice. This making it abundantly clear
least not anymore. As another example I canthat with a law forbidding gambling on the internet
state how in some countries alcohol consumptionon supposedly moral grounds then American
is considered illegal on religious and moral groundscasinos would no longer be loosing out to internet
though in others it is not. However morality shouldcompetition. This leaving the road clear for
be distinguished between right and wrong. OfAmerican gambling loses to stay in America as
course never loosing sight of how even theseopposed to leaving the country. This in my opinion
two to a large extent are also subjective tois the real issue that is being disguised as morality.
interpretation though for the most part it isÂ
accepted by most of society that murder andNaturally since casinos would be making more
theft are wrong.money because of this law so would the United
ÂStates government given that casinos would have
With regards to the morality of gambling; we likehigher revenues to be taxed which in a time of
many other things such as prostitution, drinking,crisis would not come as unwanted income. This
same sex marriages, smoking, and drug takingeven goes further as when Americans gamble
can always argue about their moral aspects andless in casinos and more on the internet they also
their effect on society as a whole but can it bespend less money on traveling to those casinos,
considered wrong for people who are past aor staying in the hotels which own the casinos.
certain age (18 in most countries) to willingly riskThis creating a situation that internet gambling has
loosing their money in an attempt to win more ofnot only taken profits from American casinos but
it even if this be on the internet? These peopleall those businesses connected to them. So taking
after all are aware that there is a chance thatthese factors in to consideration, I in my believe
their money will be lost, at least to them. This is a(if no one else's) claim this law was passed to
question I would reply in the negative; giving theassist casinos in America and their associated
following reason. Why should it be less moral for abusinesses in making higher profits while hiding
person to win or loose money in gambling on thebehind the smoke screen that is morality. Moral
internet then it is on "Wall Street"? This being agrounds being that people loose their money and
place were even larger sums of money are woncommunities suffers as if the same thing did not
and lost. If we lend some thought to the matter;occur when the identical activity is carried out in
is "investing" money on the stock market not athe casinos of Los Vegas or Atlantic City.
form of gambling as one is never sure one willÂ
profit or not unless one has inside informationOf course like with prohibition which did not stop
which is even illegal. Naturally I am aware thatdrinking but rather increased it; this law based on
there are those who will say that on the stockhypocrisy will also not stop online gambling either;
market money is neither won nor loss but simplyeven for Americans (let alone people from other
changes hands well is it not the same case withcountries) as all they need do is travel outside the
online gambling and in this argument, let it not slipUS or simply find a foreign bank to issue them a
our minds that investing (or gambling) on thecredit card that is not bound to uphold laws that
stock market may also be done on the internet.simply do not make sense and serve no purpose
Âother then the interest of a select few.