Defending The Lord's Table: The Transcendental Failure of Paedocommunion

Lately, the world of reformed Christian churchesall), for children.But Proverbs 20:10 clearly weighs
(often called "Calvinists" and "Presbyterians") hasin against just such ethical bifurcations required by
displayed a fervent preoccupation with a doctrineanti-theonomic positions: "Differing weights and
gaining currency, which bears the namediffering measures, the Lord detests them both." I
"paedocommunion." This heterodox notion aspireshasten to add here the very next verse, which in
to usurp the unanimous testimony of the Holycontext deliberately expands on it -- reads, "Even
Scripture and the solitary testimony of thea child is known by his doings, whether his work
confessional reformation, usually identified asbe pure, and whether it be right." And since to do
"credo-communion."What is paedocommunionwhat is right means to do what God has
[hereafter "PC"]? It is the practice of giving thecommanded, the Bible clearly teaches that children
Lord's Supper to baptized children, even apartand adults NEVER properly have two different
from a rite of passage or criterion such asethical standards applied to them -- as the PC
confirmation or the making of a credibleposition requires in its conflicting interpretations of
profession of faith. Herein, unless specified more"one standard for all," and yet different standards
particularly, however, PC refers to the doctrineused in 1 Cor. 10 as set over against 1 Cor.
which advocates the practice of giving the Lord's11.Thus, we find the PC advocate cannot maintain
supper apart from a prior examination, ratherhis pet exegtical strategy in 1st Corinthians 11, on
than to the practice itself.Contrariwise, I will usethe one hand, and the integtrity of a single ethical
"credocommunion" [hereafter "CC"] to refer tostandard required by his Theonomy, on the other.
the doctrine which advocates the practice ofHow did Dr. Bahnsen say it so often ... oh yes,
requiring a test (criterion) for cognitive and moralnow I remember, "You cannot have it BOTH
maturity (as judged by the elders of a particularways."C. Paedocommunion vs. the Biblical Doctrine
church) as a prerequisite for participating in theof The Nature of Oaths and CovenantsNext we
sacrament of the Lord's supper. The followingcome to examine whether or not the PC position
provides an excellent and brief overview of themeshes with the biblical teaching on the
confessional perspective on the Lord's supper. It isrequirements for confirming covenants. These, we
this position I purport to defend at present,will see, are different than those required for
though the whole confessional position is muchinitiating oaths and covenants in the Bible. First, we
longer, consisting as it does of the Westminsternote that God has given historically two
Confession of Faith (1646), chapter 29 and thesacraments as signs and seals of the various
Larger Catechism, questions #168 - #177. Here isadministrations of the covenant of grace: the first
the abbreviated form from WCF chapter 29:I. Ourinitiatory and probationary, and the second
Lord Jesus, in the night wherein he was betrayed,continuous and confirmatory; in the first, the
instituted the sacrament of his body and blood,recipient of grace remains passive and receptive;
called the Lord's Supper, to be observed in hisin the second, the receiver of grace actively
Church unto the end of the world; for theparticipates in the oath-based ritual in question.The
perpetual remembrance of the sacrifice of himselftwo trees in the garden of Eden provide
in his death, the sealing all benefits thereof untoexamples: the trees of life, and of the knowledge
true believers, their spiritual nourishment andof good and evil. The first showed a kind of
growth in him, their further engagement in and toprobation and the other signified and sealed one in
all duties which they owe unto him; and to be arighteousness. The Old Covenant likewise displays
bond and pledge of their communion with him, andtwo sacraments, (initiatory and probationary).
with each other, as members of his mysticalThose circumcised into the Mosaic covenant took
body.III. The Lord Jesus hath, in this ordinance,on this initiatory rite to enter the OT Church, the
appointed his ministers to declare his word ofpeople of Israel.Israel's sacrificial system, summed
institution to the people, to pray, and bless theup in the Passover, continued throughout the life
elements of bread and wine, and thereby to setof Israel, confirming the life promised by the
them apart from a common to an holy use; andcovenant Lord. Here, the sacrificer waxed
to take and break the bread, to take the cup,reckless only at his own injury (2 Samuel 6:5-15
and (they communicating also themselves) to giveand Lev 10:1-3).The New Covenant also displays
both to the communicants; but to none who aretwo sacraments where Baptism corresponds to
not then present in the congregation.The titlecircumcision (See Colossians 2:12-13), both of
above indicates that the doctrine of PC incurs awhich function as a sign and seal of the covenant
"transcendental failure." What I mean by thisof grace. Neither confers grace merely by the
maybe better understood with a brief history ofelements themselves.After -- and only after (note
the idea of a "transcendental." This referred withthe biconditional) -- one's probation is fulfilled, he
German philosopher, Immanuel Kant, to the mostmay be confirmed in his rights and priviledges of
basic categories (i.e. modes, etc) of humanthe second sacrament, which, in the case of the
perception, or (in more modern terms) ways inNT is the Lord's Supper.These examples, both
which people are "hardwired" to view and interactfrom the Older and Newer covenants provide
with the world. A more obscure Dutch theologian,instances of a more general point about making
one Cornelius Van Til, used the idea in a noveland taking oaths (of which covenants are a
way by applying these not to people, but to thesubset). The making of any oath by one
worldviews -- basic units of thought which formrecognized as a domestic inferior in the Bible (i.e. a
an interpretive matrix for understanding what kindwife, son or daughter) is subject to judicial review
of world this is (metaphysics), how we knowand nullification by the federal head of the
what we know (epistemology), and how wehouse.Numbers 30:3-5 reads:If a woman also vow
ought to live our lives (ethics). For Dr. Van Til,a vow unto the LORD, and bind herself by a
transcendentals comprise the most basic parts ofbond, being in her father's house in her youth; And
a worldview, which woven together properlyher father hear her vow, and her bond wherewith
provide the foundational picture of the world thatshe hath bound her soul, and her father shall hold
enables us to make sense out of life'shis peace at her; then all her vows shall stand, and
experiences."Transcendentals" thus render humanevery bond wherewith she hath bound her soul
experience intelligible to us. Without them, one'sshall stand. But if her father disallow her in the day
attempts to account for the different features ofthat he heareth; not any of her vows, or of her
what we wake up to in the morning (the unity ofbonds wherewith she hath bound her soul, shall
our experience and yet the many different kindsstand: and the LORD shall forgive her, because
of particular things making up that experience,her father disallowed her.D. Common Objections
called the "problem of the one and the many" byto Credocommunion Overcome.Some have
some) would leave some or all such features ofalleged that this position requires an arbitrariness
reality unexplained. Thus, transcendentals skillfullyon the part of the elders since the Bible provides
interlaced into a cognitive framework -- as withno objective way to decide when a child may
the Christian worldview -- provide the elementalbegin taking the Lord's Supper. I answer that a
interpretive components sufficient to "makenon-arbitrary marker of delineating readiness for
sense of it all."But for the transcendentals tothe Lord's supper does in fact exist in the Bible:
render an account coherent, they must be relatednature itself. With puberty comes physical
to each other in a consistent fashion. For adevelopment, including the ability to think in terms
worldview to accomplish its "interpretive function,"of abstract and moral reasoning. This then
it cannot permit internal dissonance among itsprovides the obvious point at which elders ought
many parts, for this would ruin its claim toto begin an inquiry for readiness on the part of
coherence. Each part of the worldview in questionthe child in concert with the assessment of the
must sweetly comport with the others -- bothhead of the house.Moreover, Paul regularly appeals
the transcendental, or more basic parts, as wellin the Scripture to such markers offered from
as those more peripheral, in order to manage thenature, saying things like "does not even nature
"consent of all the parts." Thus any worldviewteach us..." . In the case of maturity as readiness
whose basic elements relate to each other likefor communion, the Scripture (Luke 2:41) agrees
Larry, Moe and Curly (dissonantly) necessarilywith this."And when he was 12 years old, they
cannot provide the transcendentals -- for some ofwent up [to the passover] according to the
its parts would logically exclude somecustom." That this was Jesus first trip to
transcendental elements, thus promotingPassover is manifest from the context, and in this
"epistemological chaos."Now how is any of thismost commentators agree. J. Jeremias, in his
profitable to this discussion? It implies that onelandmark Jerusalem in the Time of Jesus, throws
may test the veridicality (truthfulness) of anysome valuable light on this custom. He says, "...we
doctrine by superimposing it, as it were, upon themay conclude (from Luke 2:41) that it was
Christian worldview to see if it implies the othercustom among people from a distance to bring
parts of that worldview, so that one may seetheir children when they reached twelve years of
clearly whether it relates to the biblical outlookage." (p. 76) Before twelve years of age, they
either by the consent of all the parts (logicalremained at home.Some have challenged that all
coherence) or else by the dissent of many of thethe privileges of membership in the covenant
parts (logical dissonance). When we attempt this --community belong to all the saints, and that
and we will do so shortly -- our exercise clearlycovenant children (being saints) should be admitted
falsifies the counterfeit doctrine ofto the Lord's Table.I answer that this overlooks
paedocommunion, identifying it as an elementthe obvious point that one may not necessarily
foreign to the biblical perspective -- as we shallundertake every covenant privileges from the
see.Our first test for the PC doctrine finds itmoment of his entry into the covenant
wholly incompatible with a biblical doctrinecommunity (i.e. Church). Although each person
accepted by most advocates of PC, one typically(saint) in principle has every spiritual blessing in
dubbed "postmillenial eschatology."A.Christ from the moment of his or her baptism,
Paedocommunion v. Postmillenial EschatologyPCyet he does not inherit them all at once in
advocates promote as a reason for yielding topractice -- but only in principle. Likewise, he obtains
their view the idea that the early Christian Churchall his spiritual gifts from the moment he is born
unanimously or generally promoted PC for theagain, but this does not entitle him to begin
first nine centuries of its history. Moreover, theypreaching the gospel -- even if he is so called --
often give various reasons for why thewithout first undertaking intellectual preparation
Reformed confessions at present unanimouslyand certification by elders of the church.Examples
reject PC in favor of CC. This means that bothof "delayed privileges" in the Bible include the facts
sides are agreed, at least, that the Christianthat:* No male can go to war to fight for his
church's confessional position presently is CC, notcountry until he reaches the age of 20.* No
PC.This places an interesting question before usminister may begin ministering in an official
then. Given postmillenial eschatology's demand thatecclesiastical post until he reaches the age of
the Church must grow in the grace andthirty, (see the Levitical age requirement and the
knowledge of our Lord Jesus progressively overLukan account of the age at which Jesus began
time (corporate sanctification), which should weministering) even though he receives the gifts for
tend to favor, that of the early (far lessministry at the moment he is born of the Spirit.*
doctrinally mature) or the much later and muchNo one may "practice the theology" (Ahem) of
more learned church? Or, put differently, whichthe Song of Solomon until he or she is first
view identifies the era of greater grace andmarried.E. Paedo-communion vs. Salvation by
sanctification in the Church, the second or theGrace alone through FAITH alone.The classical
seventeenth century? By answering the questionreformed (and biblical) formulation of the grace
consistently with the postmillenial outlook, thecommunicated by the sacraments comes to the
progress of the corporate sanctification of theheart of the believer who participates rightly via
Church would require us to favor the CCthe sanctifying work of the Holy Spirit who
position.B. By What Standard? Paedocommunionindwells every regenerate saint. But the doctrine
vs. Theonomic EthicsMany, if not most, of theof PC seeks to circumvent this understanding by
advocates for the PC position hold to the biblicalmaking the Lord's supper efficacious in the life of
position ordinarly dubbed "Theonomy," the biblicalthe UNbelieving saint also -- the saint before he is
view which maintains the principle of continuity asold enough even to understand the gospel, and,
a rule for distinguishing which of the laws of thetherefore (ordinarily) to possess saving faith. The
Older Testament continue to bind men andScripture says plainly enough that faith comes by
women to the performance thereof, and whichhearing, and hearing by the word of God
laws do not, in the Newer Testament. This[preached]. By making the sacramental grace
principle simply affirms that unless abrogated orefficacious APART from the faith-imparting work
qualified by a New Testament passage, or by theof the Spirit results in (i.e. implies) affirming the
logical force of several such passages combined,doctrine of "mechanistic grace" common referred
Older Testamental laws continue to bind men toto by people addicted to Latin as "ex opere
perform them as orginially given.This implies, andoperato."But this has the easy and swift
Theonomists like the late Dr. Greg Bahnsen staterefutation that mechanistic grace is a "yes or no"
so explicitly in their works, that God judges allproposition in which it would not be possible to
men by the one and same standard -- the law ofreceive baptism in an "unworthy manner" - you
God -- which may be known by a propereither do or do not receive it - and no one would
application of the principle of continuity in studyingever die from participitating in such a version of
out the various texts -- together with otherthe Lord' s Supper the wrong fashion. This is
sound rules for properly interpreting the Word ofbecause the curse as well as the blessing
God. So far, so good. But PC advocates quicklyattending holy communion remain the work of the
run up against an enigma created by one of theirSpirit of grace.But since faith is in fact a biblical
very own exegetical necessities.Now PCprerequisite for receiving the blessing of
proponents need to circumvent the CCcommunion, so also is the proper understanding of
requirement for children to show themselves ablethe gospel (intellectual maturity), since faith comes
to examine and assess the moral quality of theirby hearing and understanding the Word of the
lives against the standard of God's Word as aLord.CONCLUSION: From this brief introduction
way of preparing to partake of the Lord's supperand internal critique of a counterfeit doctrine and
in a worthy manner. The perennially disputedthe positions normally associated with it in a
passage in question reads, "But let a man examineChristian (Theonomic-Postmillenial) worldview, it
himself, and so let him eat of that bread, andshould be apparent almost immediately that the
drink of that cup . . ." Here, PC adherents quicklydoctrine of paedocommunion contradicts several
point out that this must not apply to children (formajor features of biblical teaching, denying in
it says "man") and the early typologicalprinciple the consent of all the parts. Therefore,
counterpart (see 1 Cor. 10:1 ff) surely includedthe Bible necessarily teaches the doctrine of
children without requiring such a test.If we grantcredocommunion, and the Westminster divines
this position, however (simply for the sake ofonce again win the day. These were wise
argument), we may quickly note that none of themen.Carson Day has written some 1.3 gazillion
persons -- children OR ADULTS -- in thearticles and essays on all manner of topics. These
typological shadow of "spiritual food and drink" inaim to glorify God and offer people real help to
the previous chapter had to meet any suchlive wisely and well. You can visit Carson's
cognitive criterion; yet in 1 Corinthians 11, PCwebsites at (The Omniblog, where Carson blogs
advocates expect us to accept the view thateverything) or (Carson's Day Trading Outpost).
God has now chosen to require one communionThanks for stopping by.
standard for adults, and a different one (none at